Republicans in Dixie Reply

In the 1860 USA election, why was Lincoln absent from the ballot in ten slave states? Why was this allowed? Was this vote suppression?

"Broadside" showing national Democratic ticket in 1860 with Virginia electors.
Southern Democratic ticket in Virginia, 1860. The national Democratic ticket actually won the state, although very narrowly. (Courtesy Museum of the Confederacy

This “broadside” or handbill showed the the Southern Democratic ticket of 1860 in Virginia — note the list of electors, who were prominent men in their communities. On the other hand, there were no Republican electors in ten of eleven Southern states, Virginia being the only exception. (But I can’t find a handbill for them!)

The Republican Party was quite new, having been founded only six years before, in 1854. It was specifically an anti-slavery party. The 1860 platform rather grudgingly acknowledged the legality of slavery in the states where it existed. But it strongly opposed any extension of slavery into the territories, and furiously denounced enforcement of the fugitive slave laws.

This was not a platform calculated to win support in the South.

The Republican Party essentially did not exist in the South. No committee, no followers, no nothing, in the Southern states.

More…

McAuliffe scores unimpressive win Reply

How much satisfaction can the Democrats take in yesterday’s elections in Virginia? Not too much, I think. Their candidate for governor spent over $30 million and scored something less than an impressive win.

The biggest winners may be the downtown Richmond hotels, which will fill up with election lawyers coming in from all over the country for the recount in the race for Attorney General. Republican Mark Obenshain has a lead of 726 votes out of 2,205,843 cast, according to the State Board of Elections. That’s close enough that Democrat Mark Herring has the right to request a recount paid for by the state.

In the race for governor, Republican Ken Cuccinelli must be wondering what he did to deserve such rotten luck. Almost nothing went right for him. The government shutdown in early October infuriated tens of thousands of federal employees who blamed the Republicans for those anxious couple of weeks. The Washington Post published a poll showing him way behind, which no doubt cost him plenty in campaign contributions. And the embarrassing scandal of a businessman’s gifts to Governor and Mrs. McDonnell cost him the active support of a formerly popular figure.

He also had to contend with a Libertarian Party candidate, someone named Sarvis, who barely campaigned but served as a sort of depository for the anybody-but vote. He collected 145,418 votes, or 6.5%. How many of those would have otherwise gone to Cuccinelli, no one can say, but he could easily have cost Cuccinelli the election.

Cuccinelli has only himself to blame for other misfortunes. His supporters made sure the statewide nominations would be awarded in a convention, which led to his being saddled with an unelectable candidate for lieutenant governor, the firebrand preacher E.W. Jackson. His support of a silly “personhood” bill pushed by conservative zealot Bob Marshall left him (and Obenshain) open to charges of wanting to ban birth control. And my impression is that Cuccinelli and Obenshain did not campaign very hard in Northern Virginia, where they might have been able to limit their losses.

Instead, Democrat Terry McAuliffe ran up the score in the Washington suburbs and urban centers downstate, and managed to carry the northern suburbs of Richmond (Henrico County) while leaving the more rural areas to the Republicans. More…